Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 SW3D 175 - State v. Keough

State v. Keough’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Bruton v. United States · Pulley v. Harris · State v. Bland · State v. Cazes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a writing or recorded statement or part thereof is introduced by a party, an adverse party may require the introduction at that time of any other part or any other writing or recorded statement which ought in fairness to be considered contemporaneously with it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Prior to the setting of oral argument, the Court shall review the record and briefs and consider all errors assigned. The Court may enter an order designating those issues it wishes addressed at oral argument.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.