Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Tenn. App. 1 - Garis v. Eberling

18 Tenn. App. 1 - Garis v. Eberling’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
6
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently September 2011 · most notably 32 Tenn. App. 425 - International Harvester Co. v. Sartain (1948), 40 Tenn. App. 127 - Management Services, Inc. v. Hellman (1955)

4 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

120193419401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Juries intend to be both just and reasonable but often inexperienced in the trial of such questions, excited inclinations of pity for those suffering, and sympathy with present distress, which does so much honor to our better nature under other circumstances, and so much to defeat the course of justice when operating to obscure the judgment in so serious a situation as the trial of any issues of human rights, combine to bring them to conclusions which are inconsistent with law and justice; and in such cases the court should always interpose, and preserve the rights of the parties under his more experienced and dispassionate apprehension of the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “‘£ In the instant case, the defendant knew that the children were playing around and on his car, and he knew that nothing was holding the car in place but the precarious tenure of the defective brake. The jury might well have found that in the circumstances disclosed by the record an ordinarily prudent person would have anticipated that the brake might be released and the car roll backwards down the driveway, and that such an occurrence would endanger the lives of the children.” 18 Tenn.App. at 16 , 71 S.W.2d at 224 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he mental suffering of the parents is not an element of damage for which [Tennessee] law allows compensation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.