Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 Tex. Civ. App. 721

45 S.W 737

Caufield v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1898

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1898-05-11

<p>Appeal from McLennan. Tried below before Hon. Saii R. Scott.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1898-05-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1925

3 state decisions

101898190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

FISHER, Chief Justice.

¶1 This is an appeal from a judgment by default rendered against appellant. The citation which was issued by the clerk, and upon which the sheriffs return was made, was not signed and attested by the signature of the clerk. Article 1447 of the Revised Statutes provides that all process shall be dated and attested by the clerk, with the seal of the court impressed thereon. This evidently means that the clerk shall officially sign process issued by him. This is one of the essential requirements to a valid citation, in order to give it an official and authentic character. Ho one but the clerk is authorized to issue the citation, and his official signature, together with his seal, is regarded as the evidence of his official conduct in the premises. A citation issued by an individual who is not a clerk, and one issued without such requisites, could not be regarded in law as official process.

¶2 The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

¶3 Reversed and remanded.

/18/texcivapp/721 · .json · Public domain