18 Utah 2d 157 - Russell v. Paulson’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 2006 · most notably Pickering v. American Employers Insurance (1971), Curran v. State Automobile Mutual Ins. (1971)
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 30 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile Insurance · Oregon Auto. Ins. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Howe · Smith v. Pacific Automobile Insurance · 232 Cal. App. 2d 4 - Grunfeld v. Pacific Automobile Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The basis for so holding is not always clear. It may, however, be justified on what is a rational basis of the intent of the insurance industry in its uses of such clauses to set up order of payment and limit amounts payable to prevent double recovery.” 255 Iowa 69, 73 ; 121 NW2d 500, 502 , reprinted at 18 Utah 2d 157, 161 ; 417 P2d 658, 661 . Russell, supra, and Burcham, supra, were both concerned with avoiding”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.