Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Utah 2d 354 - McGuffey v. Turner

18 Utah 2d 354 - McGuffey v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
4
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

2 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2006

2 district · 21 state decisions

12019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · 18 Utah 2d 153 - State v. Seymour · Wilson v. Hand · Application of Gaskill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is our opinion that in this case there was an effective and intelligent waiver of counsel; that the petitioner was not coerced into entering a plea of guilty; and that the sentencing court fully and fairly explained to him the consequences of a plea of guilty. We believe that the learned trial judge was in error in holding that the petitioner should be released on habeas corpus, and we reverse that holding with directions to the trial court to quash the writ and remand the prisoner to the custody of the Warden of the State Prison.” McGuffey v. Turner, 18 Utah 2d 354 , 423 P.2d 166 (1967).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is the practice in the trial courts of this State to remand a criminal case for preliminary hearing when the defendant requests it at arraignment when the preliminary hearing has been theretofore waived. It is rather difficult to see how a guilty defendant is prejudiced by waiving a preliminary hearing when all that is entailed at the hearing is that sufficient evidence be given to the committing magistrate to cause him to believe that a crime has been committed and that there is probable cause to believe the defendant guilty thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.