Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Va. App. 734 - Galbraith v. Commonwealth

18 Va. App. 734 - Galbraith v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2012

20 state decisions

140199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Arizona v. Youngblood · Fahy v. Connecticut · Frye v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A nonconstitutional error is harmless if “it plainly appears from the record and the evidence given at trial that the error did not affect the verdict.” “An error does not affect the verdict if a reviewing court can conclude, without usurping the jury’s fact finding function, that had the error not occurred, the verdict would have been'the same.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Factors ... important to the harmless error inquiry are the importance of the witness’ testimony in the prosecution’s case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of evidence corroborating or contradicting the testimony of a witness on material points, the extent of cross-examination otherwise permitted and ... the overall strength of the prosecution’s case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.