Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Wash. App. 213 - State v. Cosden

18 Wash. App. 213 - State v. Cosden’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
7
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably People v. McKenna (1978), 110 Wash. 2d 504 - State v. Belgarde (1988)

3 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

130197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · 13 Wash. App. 71 - State v. Geer · 59 Wash. 2d 381 - State v. Simmons · 16 Wash. App. 195 - State v. Upton · 13 Wash. App. 1 - State v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “strongly suggests a fabricated defense and the silence properly impeaches the later defense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(3) In any prosecution for the crime of rape or for an attempt to commit, or an assault with an intent to commit any such crime evidence of the victim's past sexual behavior including but not limited to the victim's marital behavior, divorce history, or general reputation for promiscuity, nonchastity, or sexual mores contrary to community standards is not admissible if offered to attack the credibility of the victim and is admissible on the issue of consent only pursuant to the following procedure:”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(2) Evidence of the victim's past sexual behavior including but not limited to the victim's marital history, divorce history, or general reputation for promiscuity, nonchastity, or sexual mores contrary to community standards is inadmissible on the issue of credibility ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.