Maki v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Wood v. United States (1942), Vasquez v. State (1999)
2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Young · The People v. . Mondon · The People v. . McMahon · People v. . Chapleau · State v. David
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A statement, to have been voluntarily made, must proceed from the spontaneous suggestion of the party’s own mind, free from the influence of any extraneous, disturbing cause.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Crank · State v. VM JONES““ * * * It is the general rule that self-criminating statements are not per se admissible over objection, when the evidence discloses that the defendant was in custody for the crime charged at the time of making such statements, unless shown to have been voluntarily made. Under this rule, there is no presumption that such statements are voluntarily made, but, on the contrary, the presumption is the other way, and upon the trial of an accused the burden is upon the state, seeking to prove such statements, to show their voluntary character.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dryden v. State““The manner of the examination is therefore particularly regarded; and if it appears that the prisoner had not been left wholly free, and did not consider himself to be so in what he was called upon to say, or did not feel himself at liberty to wholly decline any explanation or declaration whatever, the examination is not held to have been voluntary.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Crank
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.