Commonwealth v. Crosley’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · In the Interest of L.J. · 2009 Pa. Super. 181 - Commonwealth v. Gibbs · Commonwealth v. Melvin · 411 Pa. Super. 274 - Commonwealth v. Kearney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An appeal from an order of restitution based upon a claim that it is unsupported by the record challenges the legality, rather than the discretionary aspects, of sentencing; as such, it is a non-waivable matter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Weir“an appropriate factual record supporting restitution was made in the presence of both parties during adversarial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Weir
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.