Landsman v. Moss’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
February 2000
most recently cited
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In view of the lengthy history of this action, we ... conclude that it was improvident of the [lower] court to disqualify the plaintiffs counsel and direct her to retain new counsel. This would serve only to cause greater delay and expense to the plaintiff. Present counsel may continue to prosecute this action on the plaintiffs behalf under a new retainer agreement which shall not contain any similarly objectionable contingent fee provisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.