Fuller v. Johannessen’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 20 U.S.C. § 1087 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Grogan v. Garner · Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co. · Irving Trust Company v. Bowditch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Therefore, Appellants have not met the preponderance of the evidence standard required in Section 523 determinations of dischargeability, and this Court affirms ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“... [A] mere allegation of a cause of action under § 523 is insufficient to render the claim dischargeable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.