Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 Cal. 550 - Mann v. Scott

Mann v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
5
states following
August 1963
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 81 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently August 1963 · most notably 60 Cal. 2d 276 - Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1963), Ex Parte Daniels (1920)

2 federal appellate · 81 state decisions

240191919201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Hoffman · Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co. · Clark v. Bennett · Chrissinger v. Southern Pacific Co. · Sheperd v. St. Louis Transit Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether, if she saw the automobile, respondent would have been warranted in going toward the street car without further watching the automobile approach, relying upon a compliance by the appellants with the requirements of the ordinance [to stop back of street car] was a question upon which men’s minds might well differ, and hence it was properly a case for the jury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““There is no positive duty to stop, look, and listen when a pedestrian is about to cross a city street.” (Citing authority.) (See, also, Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co., supra; Hansen v. Market St. Ry. Co., 64 Cal. App. 426, 431 [ 221 Pac. 955 ]; Park v. Orbison, 43 Cal. App. 74, 78 [ 184 Pac. 428 ].)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.