State v. Nims’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
79 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently December 2009 · most notably State v. Robinson (1993), State v. Morrill (1985)
79 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Bell v. Wolfish · Swain v. State of Alabama · Taylor v. Louisiana · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(N)one of these factors standing alone would demand a set disposition; rather it is the total mix which determines whether the defendant's right was violated.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A]ny attempt to stack a jury panel by intentionally including or excluding any members of a discernable class runs afoul of both due process and the right to a jury trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Length of delay, the reason for the delay, the defendant's assertion of his right, and prejudice to the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gooding
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.