Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 F.1d 119 - Ex parte Harlan

Ex parte Harlan’s Empirical Analysis

180 F. 119 · 1909

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 1979
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1979 · most notably Harlan v. McGourin (1910), Biddle v. Perovich (1927)

19 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

6019091910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reynolds v. States · Bain Jr · Ex Parte Nielsen · In re Bonner · United States v. Pridgeon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is due to social order and proper regard for the majesty of the law, that a sentence, especially when affirmed by an appellate court, should be executed without undue delay, and courts should be careful not to give countenance to factious resistance to the orderly operation of the law by lightly admitting a convicted prisoner to bail. On the other hand, it is also to be borne in mind that the law is quick to afford opportunity and means to the citizens to redress wrongs at its hands, and delighting as it does, in the liberty of the citizen, will not, except in rare instances, compel the prisoner to undergo sentence before the final court has spoken, when he is honestly pursuing legal means to avoid a conviction.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is the right and privilege of a person deprived of his liberty to review to the extent permitted by law the legality of his detention, even when it is pursuant to the judgment or sentence of a court; and the exe eution of the sentence should he stayed pending the final determination, unless very exceptional circumstances justify the court in refusing to do so.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.