Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 F.1d 681 - Quillan

Quillan’s Empirical Analysis

180 F. 681 · 1910

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
May 2002
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2002

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

201910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Jason · The Wm. J. Quillan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Clearly, much of the Shippers' case rests upon this contention and the companion assertion that Congress codified the fault- or knowledge-based rule of Quillan when it enacted COGSA. 27 39 The facts of Quillan are straightforward. In 1905, a cargo owner chartered the schooner William J. Quillan to carry a cargo of tankage (a dry powder derived from processed street garbage) from Barren Island, New York, to Savannah, Georgia. Tankage, observed the Quillan Court,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The conclusion arrived at by the highest courts of the greatest commercial nation in the world [ i.e., Great Britain] ought to have weight everywhere.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “does not show that the defendants [in that case] would have been held liable if they had not known that the contents of the casks were dangerous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.