Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

180 F.2d 175

Docket No. 11020.

Woods v. Palicka

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 18, 1950.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-02-18

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1950

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1950-02-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Paul Marshall, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

¶2Lukas R. Boyson, Elyria, Ohio, for appellee.

¶3Before MARTIN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The above cause coming on to be heard, and it appearing that appellant heretofore filed a motion for reversal of the judgment of the District Court, and on the hearing of such motion, an order was entered by this court providing that unless objections to the granting of appellant’s motion for reversal of the judgment be filed with this court on or before February 17, 1950, that an order would be entered granting *176appellant’s motion; and' it further appearing that in the said order of the court, it was provided that a copy of that order be served by mail by the Clérk of this court upon counsel for appellee at least ten days prior to the date provided for the ‘filing of the said objections; and it further appearing that a copy of the said order was served by the Clerk of this court upon counsel, as required in accordance with the said order, and no objections having been filed, ■

¶6Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the above cause be remanded to the District Court for entry óf a judgment granting appellant’s petition for restitution as prayed, as well as for a permanent injunction.

/180/f2d/175 · .json · Public domain