Nave v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
180 F.2d 198 · 1950
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 1996
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Zerbst v. Kidwell · Anderson v. Corall · Bomar v. Keyes · Linn Lane Timber Company v. United States · National Pressure Cooker Co. v. Aluminum Goods Manufacturing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the warden of the prison or penitentiary from which said prisoner was paroled or said board of parole or any member thereof shall have reliable information that the prisoner has violated his parole, then said ■ warden, at any time within the term or terms of the prisoner's sentence, may issue his warrant to any officer hereinafter authorized to execute the same, for the retaking of such prisoner.” (Italics ours.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Taylor v. Simpson““Any officer of any Federal penal or correctional institution, or any Federal officer authorized to serve criminal process within the United States, to whom a warrant for the retaking of a parole violator is delivered, shall execute such warrant by taking such prisoner and returning him to the custody of the Attorney General.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Robinson v. Sartwell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.