Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 F.2d 397 - Goodall v. United States

Goodall v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

180 F.2d 397 · 1950

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2006 · most notably Green v. United States (1957), Fuller v. United States (1967)

47 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

260195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Tobacco Co. v. United States · Evans v. United States · Stevenson v. United States · American Tobacco Co. v. United States · Corens v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whoever, being of sound memory and discretion, kills another purposely, either of deliberate and premeditated malice or by means of poison, or in perpetrating or attempting to perpetrate any offense punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary, or without purpose so to do kills another in perpetrating or in attempting to perpetrate any arson, as defined in section 22-401 or 22-402 of this Code, rape, mayhem, robbery, or kidnapping, or in perpetrating or in attempting to perpetrate any housebreaking while armed with or using a dangerous weapon, is guilty of murder in the first degree. (Mar. 3, 1901, 31 Stat. 1321 , ch. 854, § 798; June 12, 1940, 54 Stat. 347 , ch. 339, § 1.)””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[I]t is proper for the court to define both crimes, leaving it to the jury to say which, if either, had been committed; and to add that, if they entertained a reasonable doubt as to the degree, they should find the defendant guilty of the lesser crime.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.