Tighe E. Woods, Housing Expediter v. Edward E. Garlits, Jr.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Feb. 21, 1950. Decided March 21, 1950.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-03-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1950

1 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on Woods v. Polis

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1950-03-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Louise F. McCarthy, Washington, D.C., Ed Dupree, General Counsel, A. M. Edwards, Jr., Acting Assistant General Counsel, Washington, D.C. (on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

We have carefully considered the briefs, the record and the oral argument in this case and we have concluded that except in one particular the decree of the court below should be affirmed. Subparagraph '2' of the third paragraph of the order is too broad in view of our decision in Woods, Housing Expediter, v. Polis, 3 Cir., 180 F.2d 4, as amended March 13, 1950. Consequently the subparagraph referred to will be stricken from the decree entered by the court below on July 18, 1949. In all other respects the decree will be affirmed.