Smith v. United States

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 17, 1950.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1950-02-17

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1968

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Mignogna · Katz v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1950-02-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Gunther Jacobson, New York City, for appellant.

¶2 *852Edward T. Kane, Detroit, Midi., and Janet E. Kinnane, Bay City, Midi., for the United States.

¶3Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties; and the court being of the opinion that the action of tihe District Judge in denying appellant’s motion to permit her to withdraw her plea of guilty and to set aside the judgment of conviction was. not an abuse of his discretion in the matter; Rule 32(d), Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.; Katz v. United States, 6 Cir., 161 F.2d 869; United States v. Mignogna, 2 Cir., 157 F.2d 839, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.