Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 F.2d 965 - McClyman v. Hamilton

McClyman v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

180 F.2d 965 · 1950

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 1954
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Hemphill Schools, Inc. v. Commissioner · Podlasky v. Price · Tatum v. Acadian Production Corporation · Bernards v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But, the alleged bankrupt argues: the averment in the petition for involuntary bankruptcy that the American Surety Co. is a creditor having a provable claim fixed as to liability and liquidated as to amount is a mere conclusion of law; the claim is not fixed and liquidated, because it has not yet been determined how much, if any, the alleged bankrupt is indebted to his employer — in other words this claim could not be fixed and liquidated until a judgment is rendered against the alleged bankrupt. “In support of the contention that this petition is defective because it has not been reduced to judgment, the alleged bankrupt cites the report of the master dismissing creditors’ petitions in the case of In re Fowler. Therein, the petitioners claimed damages for the anticipatory breach of executory contracts, and the master concluded that Section 59, sub. b of the Bankruptcy Act, supra, intended to exclude all claims whose amounts had not been determined by some sort of adjudication or by agreement between the parties. However, the nature of the claims were obviously not fixed and liquidated. “Herein, we are only permitted to examine the record before us. The fact that these claims may be flexible and unliquidated are based upon assumptions extrinsic to the record. “(2,3) This petition is not distinguishable from one alleging a debt created by reason of goods sold and delivered and services ren dered under contract, or the existence of a book account, etc. A tortious quality, inde”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.