Brown v. Andrews’s Empirical Analysis
180 F.3d 403 · 1999
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2018
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Waller v. Georgia · Cummings v. West · Ayala v. Speckard · Maldonado v. Charles Scully & Green Haven Correctional Facility · Brown v. Kuhlmann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the party seeking to close the hearing must advance an overriding interest that is likely to be prejudiced; (2) the closure must be no broader than necessary to protect that interest; (3) the trial court must consider reasonable alternatives to closing the proceeding; and (4) [the trial court] must make findings adequate to support the closure.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in large measure on the significance of the testimony during the closure itself. Specifically, this case did not involve the classic courtroom closure during the testimony of an undercover police officer who was a party to a buy-and-bust drug transaction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a specific connection between the perceived threat to the officer and the officer's public testimony in the particular proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.