Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 F.3d 464 - United States v. Case

United States v. Case’s Empirical Analysis

180 F.3d 464 · 1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
July 2008
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553

Relies on United States v. Stroud · United States v. Broderson · United States v. Reed · United States v. Martin · United States v. Cassiliano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'consciously act[ed] with the purpose of obstructing justice ... ’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) threatening, intimidating, or otherwise unlawfully influencing a co-defendant, witness, or juror, directly or indirectly, or attempting to do so; (b) committing, suborning, or attempting to suborn perjury; (c) producing or attempting to produce a false, altered, or counterfeit document or record during an official investigation or judicial proceeding; (f) providing materially false information to a judge or magistrate; (g) providing a materially false statement to a law enforcement officer that significantly obstructed or impeded the official investigation or prosecution of the instant offense ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.