Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 F.3d 699 - Williams v. Bramer

Williams v. Bramer’s Empirical Analysis

180 F.3d 699 · 1999

Citation profile

152
cited by 152 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 152 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably DeWalt v. Carter (2000), Johnson v. Johnson (2004)

43 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

8601999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Washington v. Davis · Siegert v. Gilley · Hudson v. McMillian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 152 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) an injury (2) which resulted directly and only from the use of force that was clearly excessive to the need and (3) the force used was objectively unreasonable.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]n this context, we hold that, although suffering from dizziness, loss of breath, and coughing are not significant injuries, combined, they qualify as a cognizable injury when the victim is maliciously assaulted by a police officer.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an officer's use of a racial epithet, without harassment or some other conduct that deprives the victim of established rights, does not amount to an equal protection violation”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.