No. 98-2550’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2016
4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · Ryther v. KARE 11 · Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc. · Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“similarly situated in all relevant respects ... when the only evidence of pretext or discrimination is disparate treatment”). Here, Peda has come forward with no evidence, much less a strong showing, that she and her replacement at FDAH were similarly situated. 3 . The court notes that, in any event, the individual defendants could not be held liable under Title VII:”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a good reason, bad reason or no reason at all, but they cannot be based on intentional retaliation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.