Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

180 F. App'x 161

Johnson v. Johnson

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 2, 2006

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-03-02

Relies on Marin v. Suter

Decided 2006-03-02

¶1JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM

¶2This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. It is

¶3ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed July 29, 2005, be affirmed. The district court correctly determined it lacked authority to order the Supreme Court staff to accept appellant’s pleadings or to take any other action. See Marin v. Suter, 956 F.2d 339 (D.C.Cir. 1992) (per curiam).

¶4Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

/180/fappx/161 · .json · Public domain