Thomson Licensing SA v. Beery

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 27, 2006

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-04-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2017

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-04-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Jack Beery moves to dismiss Licensing SA’s appeal (USDC for SD Ohio # 3:02-CV-311) as moot, due to settlement. Thomson Licensing SA has not responded.

¶3Upon consideration thereof,

¶4IT IS ORDERED THAT:

¶5(1) The court’s October 19, 2005 order dismissing this appeal is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated to allow the present dismissal.

¶6(2) Jack Beery’s motion to dismiss is granted.

¶7(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

¶8(4) All other pending motions and petitions are denied as moot.