Austin v. Sears’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
February 2009
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Cook v. Cook · Pimentel v. Conselho Supremo de Uniao Portugueza do Estado da California · Moths v. United States · 15 Cal. App. 2d 599 - Shaw v. Johnson · Hester v. Hester
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““You do not need to name a beneficiary if you are satisfied to have your life insurance benefits paid in the order of precedence noted below. If you are survived by a designated beneficiary, the benefits will be paid to the beneficiary. If there is no designated beneficiary surviving, the benefits will be paid to your widow or widower under category (1); and if you have no survivor falling in category (1), the benefits will be paid to the survivors falling in category (2); and so on, as necessary, to the other categories. (1) Your widow or widower. (2) Your child or children in equal shares, with the share of any deceased child distributed among the descendants of that child. (3) Your parents in equal shares or the entire amount to the surviving parent. (4) The duly appointed executor or administrator of your estate. (5) Your next of kin under the laws of your State of domicile at the time of your death. “If you wish to name a person or persons not included in the categories above, or to name a person or persons listed but in a different order, you should designate a beneficiary. You may secure the proper form to name a beneficiary or to change the designation from the U. S. Civil Service Commission, Washington 25, D. C. To be valid, your designation or change of beneficiary must be in writing, signed and witnessed, and must be received by the Commission before your death. A witness to the designation may not receive payment as a beneficiary. You do not need the consent of an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sears v. Austin““Unquestionably, decedent failed to follow the prescribed procedure in executing the designation of plaintiff, but it is equally free of doubt that the will manifested an unequivocal intention that the proceeds of the policy should accrue to her. Considering the particular circumstances of his case, and in view of the fact that decedent was a sick and ailing man, the execution of the will can be deemed a reasonable effort on his behalf to execute the designation of plaintiff as beneficiary.” [ 180 F.Supp. 489 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sears v. Austin“[T]he amount of group life insurance and group accidental death insurance in force on an employee at the date of his death shall be paid ... to the beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by the employee in a signed and witnessed writing received before death in the employing office.... For this purpose, a designation, change, or cancellation of beneficiary in a will or other document not so executed has no force or effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.