Heilman v. Heilman’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1957
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Christlieb v. Christlieb · Ritchie v. Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Co. · Prier v. Lancaster · Achenbach v. Baker · Bowen v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This is a child custody case in which a mother is seeking custody of her son now in custody of his paternal grandmother. She was never found to be an unfit person to have custody. We have read this record. Were the case here we would hold that following our opinion in Christlieb v. Christlieb, 179 Kan. 408 , 295 P. 2d 658 , the trial court should have awarded complete and full custody to the mother, Clara Heilman. Only failure of the appeal causes us to withhold making such an order.” (p. 119.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Leach v. Leach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.