Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 Kan. 648 - State v. Cook

State v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Baldwin · Cockrill v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. · Wilkes v. Clark · Anness Supply Co. v. Case · State v. Callahan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Wilkes v. Coal Co., 95 Kan. 493 , 148 Pac. 768 , it was held that a witness may refresh his recollection from a memorandum made under his direction, and in Cockrill v. Railway Co., 90 Kan. 650 , 136 Pac. 322 , it was held that the report of a commission company was competent and might be used by a shipper to refresh his recollection of the sums received for the animals composing the shipment, stated to be as he remembered it, the weight and force of the testimony being for the jury.” (p. 650, 651.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.