Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 Kan. 726 - State v. Bonskowski

State v. Bonskowski’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
June 1986
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 1986 · most notably State v. Steward (1976), State v. Terry (1969)

27 state decisions

1801957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Stewart · State v. Streeter · State v. Eason · State v. McClellan · State v. Harmon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In the argument respecting the claim now under consideration no attempt is made to avoid or challenge the long established rules of this jurisdiction (1) that when the State has made every reasonable effort to procure the attendance of a witness, and is unable to do so, the testimony of such witness, given at the preliminary examination, may be introduced at the trial ( The State v. Chadwell, 94 Kan. 302 , 146 Pac. 420 .); (2) that the requirements of Section 10 of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of this State, providing that the accused shall be allowed to meet the witness face to face, have been complied with where a defendant has met the absent witness face to face at his preliminary hearing ( The State v. Harmon, 70 Kan. 476 , 78 Pac. 805 .); or (3) that when the trial court is satisfied from the evidence adduced by the State that it has made every reasonable effort to procure the attendance of a witness and is unable to do so, it is not error for the court to admit on the trial of the action the testimony of a witness given at a preliminary examination ( State v. Streeter, 173 Kan. 240, 241 , 245 P.2d 1177 )...." (p. 728.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.