Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 Md. 100 - Hansel v. Collins

Hansel v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2007

12 state decisions

401941195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wassum v. Feeney · Gupp v. Brown · Green v. State · Johns v. Hodges · State v. McNay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It was competent for the defendant to have made the proper inquiries, and after having satisfied himself on the subject, to have made the objection before the juror was sworn, but this he neglected to do. He waited until he had lost his case. If a party to a suit may omit to make such inquiries until after a verdict has been rendered against him, and may then set it aside on discovery and proof of the existence of a good cause of challenge against any one of the jury, it would introduce an additional element of uncertainty in the administration of justice, and lead in many cases to great and unnecessary delay and expense. The fact that the party was not aware of the disqualification when the jury was empanelled is not material; because he might have known it.” (emphasis in original)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Appellant could have made proper inquiry and objected before the juror was sworn which he did not do, but waited until over four months after he had lost the case to present this matter to the court, nor has he shown that his rights were prejudiced by the service of this juror.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.