Bennett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2001
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Neusbaum v. State · Mitchell v. State · Heyward v. State · Novak v. State · Townsend v. Kurtz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““According to the record, the appellant did not object to the sentence imposed by the trial court nor did he move to strike it out or take any proceedings thereon to properly present the question to this court on appeal and therefore as the trial court had jurisdiction, we are prevented from reviewing this point. Code, 1939, Art. 5, Sec. 10; Rule 4, Court of Appeals of Maryland; Mitchell v. State, 82 Md. 527 , 34 A. 246 ; Novak v. State, 139 Md. 538 , 115 A. 853 ; Simonson v. State, 143 Md. 413 , 122 A. 362 ; Heyward v. State, 161 Md. 685, 697 , 158 A. 897 ; Ex parte General News Bureau, Inc., 162 Md. 643 , 161 A. 259 .” Id. 180 Md. at 412 , 24 A. 2d at 788 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.