Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 MICH 367 - Chiodo v. Williams

Chiodo v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1933
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1933

4 state decisions

20191419201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. Kennedy · Beuthien v. Dillon · Ketchum v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘ ‘ The statute gave him six months after the deed to the State was recorded in Muskegon county to contest its validity. Having failed to question the proceedings within that time, he will now be precluded from doing so. Section 127, general tax law. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.