Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 MISC 756 - Lofaro v. Bee Cab Corp.

Lofaro v. Bee Cab Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1945
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I am in accord with the contention of the plaintiff to the effect that section 40 of the New York State War Emergency Act of 1942 (L. 1942, eh. 544) does not provide a blanket immunity from liability to all motorists using the public highways at nighttime. * * * I am, therefore, of the opinion that the pleading of this section is no different from the pleading of any other statute relating to speed and rules of the road. The affirmative defense, therefore, is insufficient in law and should be stricken.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.