State v. Lande’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
October 1994
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Arlen · United States v. Gates · United States v. Abbamonte · 17 Mich. App. 196 - People v. Chism · In re Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While this Court will never countenance the strategy of a clever defendant to force a trial court to require him to proceed pro se as a means of furnishing him error on appeal, if that be the case the burden is on the state to present a record adequate to establish it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lineberry v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.