State v. Breitenstein’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
March 1994
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Logan · State v. Hanlon · State v. Jennings · State v. Heaston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As the admissibility of the evidence itself must rest largely in the sound discretion of the trial court, so must the extent to which the investigation of collateral issues arising thereon may so be lodged in its discretion, and its action will not be reviewed except where its discretionary power has been manifestly abused.” 180 Mont. at 509 , 591 P.2d at 236 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Short““Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Short
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.