¶1 ¥e bave examined tbe evidence carefully and are of opinion that it is ample to sustain tbe verdict.
¶2 Tbe evidence of tbe witness Fallon, wbicb was objected to, was clearly competent as tending to prove tbe loss of tbe tobacco.
¶3 No error.
180 N.C. 674
105 S.E 324
State v. . Carrington
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 24, 1920
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1920-12-24
Appeal by defendant from Calvert, J., at tbe June Special Term, 1920, of DURHAM. This is an indictment against three defendants for tbe larceny of tobacco, tbe property of tbe Imperial Tobacco Company. At tbe conclusion of tbe evidence there was a motion for judgment of nonsuit, wbicb was overruled, and tbe defendants excepted. There was a verdict of guilty, and an appeal from tbe judgment pronounced thereon to tbe Supreme Court.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1919
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1920-12-24
View the full empirical analysis of this case →