Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 N.C. App. 1 - Stann v. Levine

180 N.C. App. 1 - Stann v. Levine’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

31 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · New Jersey v. New York · Matter of Montgomery · Kinney v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “contain a concise statement of the applicable standard(s) of review for each question presented [along with] citations of the authorities upon which the appellant relies.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory and `failure to follow these rules will subject an appeal to dismissal.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[s]uch statement shall include citation of the statute or statutes permitting appellate review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.