180 N.C. App. 439 - State v. Mullinax’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Viar v. North Carolina Department of Transportation · State v. Alexander · 175 N.C. App. 250 - State v. Hanton · 151 N.C. App. 499 - State v. Eubanks · State v. Ripley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Determining a defendant's prior record involves a ... calculation of rules and statutory applications. This calculation is a mixed question of law and fact. The 'fact' is the fact of the conviction ... and the law is the proper application of the law to the fact of a defendant's criminal record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Whitmore“[t]he prior record level of a felony offender is determined by calculating the sum of the points assigned to each of the offender's prior convictions[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Whitmore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.