Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 Neb. 529 - State v. Buttner

State v. Buttner’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
July 1997
most recently cited

2 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 1997

2 district · 16 state decisions

601966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Williamson v. United States · Sedlacek v. State · State v. Coomes · Sheely v. People

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Due process of law requires only that the accused be given sufficient notice of the nature of the charge, against him in order that he may prepare a defense and plead the judgment as a bar to any subsequent prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.