180 N.J. Super. 581 - Herold v. Inman’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bilotti v. Accurate Forming Corp. · Cirelli v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. · Gambino v. Royal Globe Insurance Companies · State v. Court of Common Pleas · 144 N.J. Super. 506 - Ortiz v. Safeco Insurance Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. The prompt and efficient provision of benefits for all accident injury victims (the reparation objective) 2. The reduction or stabilization of prices charged for automobile insurance (the cost objective) 3. The ready availability of insurance coverage necessary to the provision of accident benefits (the availability objective) 4. The streamlining of the judicial procedures involved in this third-party claim (the judicial objective) [Herold v. Inman, 180 N.J.Super. 581, 588 (Law. Div.1981)]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the bodily injury is confined solely to the soft tissue of the body and the medical expenses incurred or to be incurred by such injured person or the equivalent value thereof for the reasonable and necessary treatment of such bodily injury is less than $200, exclusive of hospital expenses, X-rays and other diagnostic medical expenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]f we were to conceive of our present body of common law in this case as an unopened loaf of bread, it would appear that this section of Chapter 6A only removes one slice from the loaf. This one slice is represented as being soft tissue injury cases where medical expenses, etc., are under $200. [ 180 N.J. Super. at 590 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.