Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 OHIOAPP3D 36 - State v. Walker-Stokes

State v. Walker-Stokes’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Hensley · 93 Ohio App. 3d 586 - State v. Retherford · Ohio v. Freeman · State v. Andrews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Blecause as a matter of law, an outstanding arrest warrant operates to deprive its subject of the reasonable expectation of privacy the Fourth Amendment protects, the exclusionary rule does not apply to the search and seizure of that subject that would otherwise be illegal ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.