Hinkle v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2002
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gille v. Emmons · Rogers, County Treasurer v. Bass Harbour Co. · Anglea v. McMaster · Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Anthony Wholesale Grocery Co. · Phoenix Bridge Co. v. Street
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"This proposition is in the nature of the plea of res adjudicata, which, in view of the prior decisions of this court, would not and could not be good, as the court holds that this is a judgment void on its face, and the fact that the defendant Keahey did not appeal from the orders overruling prior motions to vacate did not affect his rights to file subsequent motions for the reason, as set out in the statute, that a void judgment may be attacked at any time by a party affected thereby.” Id. at ¶ 28, at 1076-77.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Read v. Read““* * * A careful examination of the petition will disclose the issues that could be presented to the court by the plaintiff and any judgment rendered outside those issues is void.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Churchill v. Muegge
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.