Werfelman v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2005
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Courtney v. Barnett · Bowling v. Merry · Bettis v. Cargile · In Re McQuown · Taliaferro v. Batis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the correction of the record of the trial court is by nunc pro tunc order to correct a matter of record in the trial court only, or not of record in the trial court, the trial judge has exclusive jurisdiction to make that correction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"A judgment is rendered when pronounced by the court, and the journal entry is only a record thereof."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.