¶1(.concurring specially). T fully agree that marriage does not constitute one spouse the ancestor of the other, and I agree with the result of the majority opinion that as to the property involved, decedent’s surviving husband inherits one-half, decedent’s sister one-fourth, and decedent’s nephew, Joseph, inherits the remaining one-fourth. I do not arrive at that conclusion by the exact route of reasoning of the majority opinion, and I do not acquiesce in all the statements and reasoning of the majority opinion. I, therefore, concur in the result or in the ultimate conclusion of reversal and remand with directions.
180 Okla. 28
Watson v. Pryor
Decided December 15, 1936
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1936-12-15
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1942
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1936-12-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →