Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 Okla. 341 - Jones v. Farris

Jones v. Farris’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
August 1972
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 1972

3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

8019371940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tobin v. Tobin · Davis v. Davis · Thompson v. Thompson · Allred v. Allred

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The legal title here was in the husband. Whatever rights were available to the wife, to assert or resolve an interest in the jointly acquired property, were never by her exercised, and it may be that she never would have cared to exercise them. And even had she done so, it is uncertain what particular fraction or portion she would have obtained. We cannot hold that this right which she had, as a wife, descended to her children, for it was a right which was available if she desired to use it but which apparently she chose not to use, and which therefore was not vested. As a general rule the community character of property jointly acquired by husband and wife is dissolved by the death of either spouse (5 R.C.L. 863), unless some statute prescribes otherwise, and we have no statute which would permit the children to inherit the property in suit upon the death of their mother."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The section does not purport to vest in the wife, prior to divorce, any interest in the property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.