Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 SO 852 - Gustine v. Big Chain Stores, Inc.

Gustine v. Big Chain Stores, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 1975
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1975

10 state decisions

4019381940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glatstein v. City of Shreveport

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court said in the case of Glatstein v. City of Shreveport [La.App.] 149 So. 158, 159 , that: `The law requires that the pedestrian be observant of where and how he is going so that he may avoid dangers which ordinary care and prudence would disclose. While he is not bound to look for hidden dangers, he is required to walk with his eyes open, to observe his course, to see what is open and apparent, and to use that degree of care which the surrounding circumstances would dictate to a person of ordinary reasonable prudence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Plaintiff had traded with the store for many years, and it was customary for her to leave her car on the parking lot and enter the building through the rear entrance. In addition to being aware of the existence of the raised portion on the day of the accident when she alighted on it, she had seen it on her numerous previous visits there. Anyone looking could easily see it, according to her testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “some sudden and adequate disturbing cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.