Deans v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1984
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Adams v. State · 95 So. 2d 525 - Smith v. State · Peadon v. State · Holton v. State · 106 So. 2d 424 - Shoultz v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A long established principle that pervades the whole of criminal procedure is that after an indictment is found, nothing shall be done in the course of the trial except in the presence of the accused. 14 Am.Jur. Criminal Law § 189 (1938); 23 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 973 (1961) "Florida cases reporting that one accused of a felony has a right to be present during every step of the trial can be traced back to 1849 in Holton v. State, 1849, 2 Fla. 476 . For other authority see: Adams v. State, 1891, 28 Fla. 511 , 10 So. 106 , 117; Summeralls v. State, 1896, 37 Fla. 162 , 20 So. 242 ; Peaden v. State, 1903, 46 Fla. 124 , 35 So. 204 ; Smith v. State, Fla. 1957, 95 So.2d 525, 528 ; Shoultz v. State, Fla. 1958, 106 So.2d 424 ; Ferreri v. State, Fla.App. 1959, 109 So.2d 578 ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.