Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 180 SO2D 367 - State Ex Rel. Gerstein v. Schulz

State Ex Rel. Gerstein v. Schulz’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 1991
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1991

11 state decisions

501965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Dato v. Himes · 101 So. 2d 373 - Mead v. State · State Ex Rel. Perky v. Browne · Frederick, as Co. Solicitor v. Rowe as Judge · 122 So. 2d 807 - Clark v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is clear therefore that the circuit court has the jurisdiction to entertain the writ for the purposes of inquiring into the legality of the detention in accordance with the criteria set forth in the above cited cases. Moreover, the circuit court has jurisdiction in habeas corpus to grant bail `without regard to whether the circuit court so acting has appellate jurisdiction of the court involved.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a traditional purpose of the writ is to furnish a speedy hearing and remedy to one whose liberty is unlawfully restrained”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Section 9 of the Declaration of Rights of the Florida Constitution, F.S. A., guarantees to those charged with an offense the right to release on bail (except for capital offenses when the proof is evident and the presumption great). And Section 8 of the Declaration of Rights enjoins the imposition of excessive bail. The Florida Supreme Court has held that bail as thus provided for by the Declaration of Rights means bail which is reasonable in amount; that what is reasonable bail is determined by the circumstances of the case; and that excessive bail amounts to a denial of bail.” State ex rel. Gerstein v. Schulz, Fla.App. 1965, 180 So.2d 367, 369 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.